The Mismeasure of Man by Stephen Jay Gould is a critique of "scientific racism", starting with ideas such as craniometry[?] and the eugenics movement, and ending with recent developments in the study of race and intelligence. ISBN 0393039722
The book, originally written in 1981, describes Gould's objections to:
- "...the abstraction of intelligence as a single entity, its location within the brain, its quantification as one number for each individual, and the use of these numbers to rank people in a single series of worthiness, invariably to find that oppressed and disadvantaged groups--races, classes, or sexes--are innately inferior and deserve their status" (pp. 24-25).
The book was revised and expanded in reply to the arguments of The Bell Curve by Herrnstein and Murray, another controversial book.
In the first edition, published in 1981, Gould made a number of critical points concerning many of the studies Herrnstein and Murray were to draw on. Gould's larger point is that most scientific studies of the relationship between race and human behavior[?] have been heavily biased by the assumption that human behavior is best explained by heredity. He criticizes studies of the relationship between race and intelligence on several grounds. One thing he points out is that much of the data used by scientists was falsified (for example, in the case of a famous study of the IQs of twins separated at birth). But most of his criticisms pertain to cases where the data seems to be legitimate. Most of his arguments have to do with the value of statistical correlations (the measure of the co-occurrence of two different things). Most arguments around IQ center on the issue of correlation -- the very claim that the test measures an actual thing requires that the kinds of answers to various questions will correlate highly; the claim that this thing is inherited requires that the scores of respondents who are closely related will correlate significantly higher than results of those distantly related.
First, he points out that correlation isn't the same as cause. As he puts it, measures of the changes, over time, in "my age, the population of Mexico, the price of Swiss cheese, my pet turtle's weight, and the average distance between galaxies" will have a high positive correlation -- but that doesn't mean that Steven Jay Gould's age goes up "because" the population of Mexico goes up. Second, and more specifically, a high positive correlation between parents' IQ and children's IQ can be taken as evidence that IQ is inherited -- or that IQ is determined by social and environmental factors. Since the same data can be used to argue either side of the case, the data in and of itself isn't useful.
Furthermore, Gould makes the subtle and often ignored point that even if it were demonstrated that the correlations in IQ within a group were completely determined by heredity, this tells you nothing about the causes in differences in IQ between unrelated groups or whether those differences can be changed by environment. One example that Gould brings up is height which is known to be highly inherited. Knowing that differences in height within a single group are due to heredity tells you nothing at all about why there are height differences between different groups.
In the updated edition, Gould provides a point-by-point rebuttal of the arguments of The Bell Curve, drawing on his history of "scientific racism" as context for the arguments regarding the book.
In an interview in The Skeptic, Murray claimed that Gould misrepresented his views. Arthur Jensen made a similar complaint:
- "In his references to my own work, Gould includes at least nine citations that involve more than just an expression of Gould's opinion; in these citations Gould purportedly paraphrases my views. Yet in eight of the nine cases, Gould's representation of these views is false, misleading, or grossly caricatured. Nonspecialists could have no way of knowing any of this without reading the cited sources. While an author can occasionally make an inadvertent mistake in paraphrasing another, it appears Gould's paraphrases are consistently slanted to serve his own message." (source: [1] (http://www.mugu.com/cgi-bin/Upstream/jensen-gould-fossils?embedded=yes&cumulative_category_title=Introduction;Authors+and+Intellectuals;Arthur+Jensen&cumulative_category_id=Root;Authors;Jensen)}
Common misspelling and questions (FAQ)
he-mismeasure-of-man te-mismeasure-of-man th-mismeasure-of-man themismeasure-of-man the-ismeasure-of-man the-msmeasure-of-man the-mimeasure-of-man the-miseasure-of-man the-mismasure-of-man the-mismesure-of-man the-mismeaure-of-man the-mismeasre-of-man the-mismeasue-of-man the-mismeasur-of-man the-mismeasureof-man the-mismeasure-f-man the-mismeasure-o-man the-mismeasure-ofman the-mismeasure-of-an the-mismeasure-of-mn the-mismeasure-of-ma hte-mismeasure-of-man teh-mismeasure-of-man th-emismeasure-of-man them-ismeasure-of-man the-imsmeasure-of-man the-msimeasure-of-man the-mimseasure-of-man the-misemasure-of-man the-mismaesure-of-man the-mismesaure-of-man the-mismeausre-of-man the-mismeasrue-of-man the-mismeasuer-of-man the-mismeasur-eof-man the-mismeasureo-f-man the-mismeasure-fo-man the-mismeasure-o-fman the-mismeasure-ofm-an the-mismeasure-of-amn the-mismeasure-of-mna the-mismeasure-of-ma tthe-mismeasure-of-man thhe-mismeasure-of-man thee-mismeasure-of-man the--mismeasure-of-man the-mmismeasure-of-man the-miismeasure-of-man the-missmeasure-of-man the-mismmeasure-of-man the-mismeeasure-of-man the-mismeaasure-of-man the-mismeassure-of-man the-mismeasuure-of-man the-mismeasurre-of-man the-mismeasuree-of-man the-mismeasure--of-man the-mismeasure-oof-man the-mismeasure-off-man the-mismeasure-of--man the-mismeasure-of-mman the-mismeasure-of-maan the-mismeasure-of-mann 5he-mismeasure-of-man rhe-mismeasure-of-man fhe-mismeasure-of-man 6he-mismeasure-of-man ghe-mismeasure-of-man 6he-mismeasure-of-man yhe-mismeasure-of-man ghe-mismeasure-of-man tye-mismeasure-of-man tge-mismeasure-of-man tbe-mismeasure-of-man tue-mismeasure-of-man tne-mismeasure-of-man tue-mismeasure-of-man tje-mismeasure-of-man tne-mismeasure-of-man th3-mismeasure-of-man thw-mismeasure-of-man ths-mismeasure-of-man th4-mismeasure-of-man thd-mismeasure-of-man th4-mismeasure-of-man thr-mismeasure-of-man thd-mismeasure-of-man the0mismeasure-of-man thepmismeasure-of-man the[mismeasure-of-man the-jismeasure-of-man the-nismeasure-of-man the-kismeasure-of-man the-kismeasure-of-man the-,ismeasure-of-man the-m8smeasure-of-man the-musmeasure-of-man the-mjsmeasure-of-man the-m9smeasure-of-man the-mksmeasure-of-man the-m9smeasure-of-man the-mosmeasure-of-man the-mksmeasure-of-man the-miwmeasure-of-man the-miameasure-of-man the-mizmeasure-of-man the-miemeasure-of-man the-mixmeasure-of-man the-miemeasure-of-man the-midmeasure-of-man the-mixmeasure-of-man the-misjeasure-of-man the-misneasure-of-man the-miskeasure-of-man the-miskeasure-of-man the-mis,easure-of-man the-mism3asure-of-man the-mismwasure-of-man the-mismsasure-of-man the-mism4asure-of-man the-mismdasure-of-man the-mism4asure-of-man the-mismrasure-of-man the-mismdasure-of-man the-mismeqsure-of-man the-mismewsure-of-man the-mismezsure-of-man the-mismewsure-of-man the-mismessure-of-man the-mismezsure-of-man the-mismeawure-of-man the-mismeaaure-of-man the-mismeazure-of-man the-mismeaeure-of-man the-mismeaxure-of-man the-mismeaeure-of-man the-mismeadure-of-man the-mismeaxure-of-man the-mismeas7re-of-man the-mismeasyre-of-man the-mismeashre-of-man the-mismeas8re-of-man the-mismeasjre-of-man the-mismeas8re-of-man the-mismeasire-of-man the-mismeasjre-of-man the-mismeasu4e-of-man the-mismeasuee-of-man the-mismeasude-of-man the-mismeasu5e-of-man the-mismeasufe-of-man the-mismeasu5e-of-man the-mismeasute-of-man the-mismeasufe-of-man the-mismeasur3-of-man the-mismeasurw-of-man the-mismeasurs-of-man the-mismeasur4-of-man the-mismeasurd-of-man the-mismeasur4-of-man the-mismeasurr-of-man the-mismeasurd-of-man the-mismeasure0of-man the-mismeasurepof-man the-mismeasure[of-man the-mismeasure-9f-man the-mismeasure-if-man the-mismeasure-kf-man the-mismeasure-0f-man the-mismeasure-lf-man the-mismeasure-0f-man the-mismeasure-pf-man the-mismeasure-lf-man the-mismeasure-or-man the-mismeasure-od-man the-mismeasure-oc-man the-mismeasure-ot-man the-mismeasure-ov-man the-mismeasure-ot-man the-mismeasure-og-man the-mismeasure-ov-man the-mismeasure-of0man the-mismeasure-ofpman the-mismeasure-of[man the-mismeasure-of-jan the-mismeasure-of-nan the-mismeasure-of-kan the-mismeasure-of-kan the-mismeasure-of-,an the-mismeasure-of-mqn the-mismeasure-of-mwn the-mismeasure-of-mzn the-mismeasure-of-mwn the-mismeasure-of-msn the-mismeasure-of-mzn the-mismeasure-of-mah the-mismeasure-of-mab the-mismeasure-of-maj the-mismeasure-of-maj the-mismeasure-of-mam the-mysmeasure-of-man the-mismaesure-of-man yhe-mismeasure-of-man tyhe-mismeasure-of-man the-mismeasure-of-mansCure me, friend and woman. Decline already-- Hardly a trace of rising-- I have become the complete God And now I must cast away death. And without images... You don't love me... I have never appealed to you... And my hard eyes annoy you, my darling... And my white teeth have such a brutal shine Ah, what you say-- ... And early in the morning I am going to an ocean And lie on the beach... With sand and sun and with a white Your eyes are bright lands. Handkerchiefs gently waving goodbye. Your little stories are made of silk. White, I lie Between jagged buildings-- Toes and hands Longing tears the weeping body to pieces. Eyes grope Sunken hats I gladly left With its thousands of leering faces, I stride into the broad, The pious limbs glide I am in the white brightness Am tree, am town, am child... Soon the green evening will stand I raise blessed hands-- I go through the days And no one hears Please have pity. I hate you. Kuno Kohn sings: Lies burned to pieces. Mothers the land. Gapes once again. Stream upward. Evening Let your eyes, last sparrows, flutter. Don't you, Kuno, feel the eternal mills-- .