In mathematics, the square root of a non-negative real number x is that non-negative real number which, when multiplied by itself, gives x. The square root of x is denoted by √x. For example, √16 = 4 since 4 × 4 = 16, and √2 = 1.41421... . Square roots are important when solving quadratic equations. Trying to extend the square root function to the negative numbers leads to imaginary numbers and eventually to the field of complex numbers.
The square root symbol was first used during the 16th Century. It has been suggested that it originated as an altered form of lowercase r, representing the Latin "radix" (meaning "root").
Properties
The following important properties of the square root functions are valid for all positive real numbers x and y:
- <math>\sqrt{xy} = \sqrt{x} \sqrt{y}</math>
- <math>\sqrt{\frac{x}{y}} = \frac{\sqrt{x}}{\sqrt{y}}</math>
- <math>\sqrt{x^2} = \left|x\right|</math> for every real number x (see absolute value)
- <math>\sqrt{x} = x^{\frac{1}{2}}</math>
The square root function generally maps rational numbers to algebraic numbers; √x is rational if and only if x is a rational number which, after cancelling, is a fraction of two perfect squares. In particular, √2 is irrational.
The square root function also maps the area of a square to its side length.
Suppose that x and a are reals, and that x2=a, and we want to find x. A common mistake is to "take the square root" and deduce that x = √a. This is incorrect, because the square root of x2 isn't x, but the absolute value |x|, one of our above rules. Thus, all we can conclude is that |x| = √a, or equivalently x = ±√a.
In calculus, for instance when proving that the square root function is continuous or differentiable or when computing certain limits, the following identity often comes handy:
- <math>\sqrt{x} - \sqrt{y} = \frac{x-y}{\sqrt{x} + \sqrt{y}}</math>
It is valid for all non-negative numbers x and y which are not both zero.
The function f(x) = √x has the following graph:
The function is continuous for all non-negative x, and differentiable for all positive x (it isn't differentiable for x=0 since the slope of the tangent there is ∞). Its derivative is given by
- <math>f'(x) = \frac{1}{2\sqrt x}</math>
- <math>\sqrt{x+1}=1 +
- <math> = 1 + \frac{1}{2}x - \frac{1}{8}x^2 + \frac{1}{16} x^3 - \frac{5}{128} x^4 + \dots</math>
for |x| < 1.
Computing square roots
Calculators
Pocket calculators typically implement good routines to compute the exponential function and the natural logarithm, and then compute the square root of x using the identity- <math>\sqrt{x} = e^{\frac{1}{2}\ln x}</math>
Babylonian method
A commonly used algorithm for approximating √x is known as the "Babylonian method" and is based on Newton's method. It proceeds as follows:- start with an arbitrary positive start value r (the closer to the root the better)
- replace r by the average of r and x/r
- go to 2
This algorithm works equally well in the p-adic numbers, but cannot be used to identify real square roots with p-adic square roots; it is easy, for example, to construct a sequence of rational numbers by this method which converges to +3 in the reals, but to -3 in the 2-adics.
An exact "long-division like" algorithm
This method, while much slower than the Babylonian method, has the advantage that it is exact: if the given number has a rational square root, then the algorithm terminates and produces the correct square root after finitely many steps. It can thus be used to check whether a given integer is a square number.Write the number in decimal and divide it into pairs of digits starting from the decimal point. The numbers are laid out similar to the long division algorithm and the final square root will appear above the original number.
For each iteration:
- Bring down the most significant pair of digits not yet used and append them to any remainder
- If r denotes the part of the result found so far, determine the greatest number y equal to some digit x times (20r + x) that doesn't exceed the current value. Place new digit x on the quotient line.
- Subtract y from the current value to form a new remainder.
- If the remainder is zero and there are no more digits to bring down the algorithm has terminated. Otherwise continue with step 1.
Example: What is the square root of 152.2756?
____1__2._3__4_
| 01 52.27 56
x 01 1*1=1
____
00 52
2x 00 44 22*2=44
_______
08 27
24x 07 29 243*3=729
_______
98 56
246x 98 56 2464*4=9856
_______
00 00 Algorithm terminates: answer is 12.34
Although demonstrated here for base 10 numbers, the procedure works for any base, including base 2. In the description above, 20 means double the number base used, in the case of binary this would really be 100. The algorithm is in fact much easier to perform in base 2, as in every step only the two digits 0 and 1 have to be tested.
Pell's equation
Pell's equation yields a method for finding rational approximations of square roots of integers.
Square roots of complex numbers
To every non-zero complex number z there exist precisely two numbers w such that w2 = z. The usual definition of √z is as follows: if z = r exp(iφ) is represented in polar coordinates with -π < φ ≤ π, then we set √z = √r exp(iφ/2). Thus defined, the square root function is holomorphic everywhere except on the non-positive real numbers (where it isn't even continuous). The above Taylor series for √(1+x) remains valid for complex numbers x with |x| < 1.
When the number is in rectangular form the following formula can be used:
- <math>\sqrt{x+iy} = \sqrt{\frac{\left|x+iy\right| + x}{2}} \pm i \sqrt{\frac{\left|x+iy\right| - x}{2}}</math>
where the sign of the imaginary part of the root is the same as the sign of the imaginary part of the original number.
Note that because of the discontinuous nature of the square root function in the complex plane, the law √(zw) = √(z)√(w) is in general not true. Wrongly assuming this law underlies several faulty "proofs", for instance the following one showing that -1 = 1:
- <math>-1 = i \times i = \sqrt{-1} \times \sqrt{-1} = \sqrt{-1 \times -1} = \sqrt{1} = 1</math>
The third equality cannot be justified. See the so-called proof that 1 equals -1.
Square roots of matrices and operators
If A is a positive definite matrix or operator, then there exists precisely one positive definite matrix or operator B with B2 = A; we then define √A = B.
More generally, to every normal matrix or operator A there exist normal operators B such that B2 = A. In general, there are several such operators B for every A and the square root function cannot be defined for normal operators in a satisfactory manner. Positive definite operators are akin to positive real numbers, and normal operators are akin to complex numbers.
Square roots of the first 20 integers
√ 1 = 1
√ 2 ≈1.4142135623 7309504880 1688724209 6980785696 7187537694 8073176679 7379907324 78462
√ 3 ≈1.7320508075 6887729352 7446341505 8723669428 0525381038 0628055806 9794519330 16909
√ 4 = 2
√ 5 ≈2.2360679774 9978969640 9173668731 2762354406 1835961152 5724270897 2454105209 25638
√ 6 ≈2.4494897427 8317809819 7284074705 8913919659 4748065667 0128432692 5672509603 77457
√ 7 ≈2.6457513110 6459059050 1615753639 2604257102 5918308245 0180368334 4592010688 23230
√ 8 ≈2.8284271247 4619009760 3377448419 3961571393 4375075389 6146353359 4759814649 56924
√ 9 = 3
√10 ≈3.1622776601 6837933199 8893544432 7185337195 5513932521 6826857504 8527925944 38639
√11 ≈3.3166247903 5539984911 4932736670 6866839270 8854558935 3597058682 1461164846 42609
√12 ≈3.4641016151 3775458705 4892683011 7447338856 1050762076 1256111613 9589038660 33818
√13 ≈3.6055512754 6398929311 9221267470 4959462512 9657384524 6212710453 0562271669 48293
√14 ≈3.7416573867 7394138558 3748732316 5493017560 1980777872 6946303745 4673200351 56307
√15 ≈3.8729833462 0741688517 9265399782 3996108329 2170529159 0826587573 7661134830 91937
√16 = 4
√17 ≈4.1231056256 1766054982 1409855974 0770251471 9922537362 0434398633 5730949543 46338
√18 ≈4.2426406871 1928514640 5066172629 0942357090 1562613084 4219530039 2139721974 35386
√19 ≈4.3588989435 4067355223 6981983859 6156591370 0392523244 4936890344 1381595573 28203
√20 ≈4.4721359549 9957939281 8347337462 5524708812 3671922305 1448541794 4908210418 51276
Common misspelling and questions (FAQ)
quare-root suare-root sqare-root squre-root squae-root squar-root squareroot square-oot square-rot square-rot square-roo qsuare-root suqare-root sqaure-root squrae-root squaer-root squar-eroot squarer-oot square-orot square-root square-roto square-roo ssquare-root sqquare-root squuare-root squaare-root squarre-root squaree-root square--root square-rroot square-rooot square-rooot square-roott wquare-root aquare-root zquare-root equare-root xquare-root equare-root dquare-root xquare-root s1uare-root s2uare-root sauare-root s2uare-root swuare-root sauare-root sq7are-root sqyare-root sqhare-root sq8are-root sqjare-root sq8are-root sqiare-root sqjare-root squqre-root squwre-root squzre-root squwre-root squsre-root squzre-root squa4e-root squaee-root squade-root squa5e-root squafe-root squa5e-root squate-root squafe-root squar3-root squarw-root squars-root squar4-root squard-root squar4-root squarr-root squard-root square0root squareproot square[root square-4oot square-eoot square-doot square-5oot square-foot square-5oot square-toot square-foot square-r9ot square-riot square-rkot square-r0ot square-rlot square-r0ot square-rpot square-rlot square-ro9t square-roit square-rokt square-ro0t square-rolt square-ro0t square-ropt square-rolt square-roo5 square-roor square-roof square-roo6 square-roog square-roo6 square-rooy square-roog square-rooy square-rooty square-rootsshort, as it was already between six and seven o'clock, and she was to I was quite sensible, however; that the audience was arranged to be thus trouble, and perhaps to find occasion to renew our complaints touching some of the great personages here, without doubt, are afraid of, for they speak to her again before she goes very deep into the country." It was not however before the end of the year, after Caron had made a subject thoroughly before her Majesty. On the 14th November he had at Hampton Court, where the queen was then residing. The plundering was much quibbling and special pleading in defence of the practices which a good deal of talk about want of evidence and conflict of evidence, envoy did--unless it were according to public law for one friend and, encouraging as to the probable issue of his interview with her Majesty. Noel de Caron before the States-General; but at last the admiral their, case. At any rate he assured the envoy that he would take care of captains, so that proceedings might be had against them if it was thought to do this," he said, "and told him roundly that this was by all means made to believe that his Excellency was not seeking to get his own profit .