Established in the 1960s, chaos theory deals with dynamical systems that, while in principle deterministic, have a high sensitivity to initial conditions, because their governing equations are nonlinear. Examples for such systems are the atmosphere, plate tectonics, economies, and population growth.
Description of the theory
A non-linear dynamical system can in general exhibit one or more of the following types of behaviour:
- forever at rest
- forever expanding (only for unbounded systems)
- in periodic motion
- in quasi-periodic motion
- in chaotic motion
The type of behaviour may depend on the initial state of the system and the values of its parameters, if any.
Chaotic motion
The most famous type of behaviour is chaotic motion, a non-periodic complex motion which has given name to the theory. In order to classify the behaviour of a system as chaotic, the system must be bounded and have what is called sensitivity on the initial conditions. This means that two such systems with however small a difference in their initial state eventually will end up with a finite difference between their states.
An example of such sensitivity is the well-known butterfly effect, whereby the flapping of a butterfly's wings produces tiny changes in the atmosphere which over the course of time cause it to diverge from what it would have been and potentially cause something as dramatic as a tornado to occur. Other commonly known examples of chaotic motion are the mixing of colored dyes and airflow turbulence.
Strange attractors
One way of visualizing chaotic motion, or indeed any type of motion, is to make a phase diagram of the motion. In such a diagram time is implicit and each axis represents one dimension of the state. For instance, a system at rest will be plotted as a point and a system in periodic motion will be plotted as a simple closed curve.
A phase diagram for a given system may depend on the initial state of the system (as well as on a set of parameters), but often phase diagrams reveal that the system ends up doing the same motion for all initial states in a region around the motion, almost as though the system is attracted to that motion. Such attractive motion is fittingly called an attractor for the system and is very common for forced dissipative systems.
While most of the motion types mentioned above give rise to very simple attractors, such as points and circle-like curves called limit cycles[?], chaotic motion gives rise to what are known as strange attractors, attractors that can have great detail and complexity. For instance, a simple three-dimensional model of the Lorenz weather system gives rise to the famous Lorenz attractor. The Lorenz attractor is perhaps one of the best known chaotic system diagrams, probably because not only was it one of the first, but it is one of the most complex and as such gives rise to a very interesting pattern which looks like the eyes of an owl.
Strange attractors have fractal structure.
History
The theory has roots back to around 1950 when it first became evident for some scientists that linear theory[?], the prevailing system theory at that time, simply could not explain the observed behaviour of certain experiments like that of the logistic map. However, major parts of the theory have only been developed since around 1980 and only recently has the theory been accepted by the scientific community as a whole.
An early pioneer of the theory was Edward Lorenz whose interest in chaos came about accidentally through his work on weather prediction in 1961. Lorenz was using a basic computer to run his simulation of the weather. He wanted to see a sequence of data again and to save time he started the simulation in the middle of its course. He was able to do this by entering a printout of the data corresponding to conditions in the middle of his simulation which he had calculated last time.
To his surprise the weather that the machine began to predict was completely different to the weather calculated before. Lorenz tracked this down to only bothering to enter 3-digit numbers in to the simulation, whereas the computer had last time worked with 5-digit numbers. This difference is tiny and the consensus at the time would have been that it should have had practically no effect. However Lorenz had discovered that small changes in initial conditions produced large changes in the long-term outcome.
The importance of chaos theory can be illustrated by the following observations:
- In popular terms, a linear system is exactly equal to the sum of its parts, whereas a non-linear system can be more than the sum of its parts. This mean that in order to study and understand the behaviour of a non-linear system one need in principle to study the system as a whole and not just its parts in isolation.
- It has been said that if the universe is an elephant, then linear theory can only be used to describe the last molecule in the tail of the elephant and chaos theory must be used to understand the rest. Or, in other words, almost all interesting real-world systems are described by non-linear systems.
Mathematical theory
Mathematicians have devised many additional ways to make quantitative statements about chaotic systems[?]. These include
- fractal dimension[?] of the attractor
- Lyapunov exponents
- recurrence plots[?]
- Poincare maps[?]
- bifurcation diagrams
Minimum complexity of a chaotic system
Many simple systems can also produce chaos without relying on partial differential equations, such as the logistic equation, which describes population growth over time.
Even discrete systems can heavily depend on initial conditions, such as cellular automata. Stephen Wolfram has investigated a cellular automaton with this property, termed by him rule 30.
Other examples of chaotic systems
See also: fractal, Benoit Mandelbrot, Mandelbrot set, Julia set, predictability, Mitchell Feigenbaum[?]
References
- Chaotic and fractal dynamics by Francis C. Moon, ISBN 0471545716
Further Reading
- http://www.nbi.dk/ChaosBook/ (http://www.nbi.dk/ChaosBook/)
Common misspelling and questions (FAQ)
haos-theory caos-theory chos-theory chas-theory chao-theory chaostheory chaos-heory chaos-teory chaos-thory chaos-thery chaos-theoy chaos-theor hcaos-theory cahos-theory choas-theory chaso-theory chao-stheory chaost-heory chaos-hteory chaos-tehory chaos-thoery chaos-theroy chaos-theoyr chaos-theor cchaos-theory chhaos-theory chaaos-theory chaoos-theory chaoss-theory chaos--theory chaos-ttheory chaos-thheory chaos-theeory chaos-theoory chaos-theorry chaos-theoryy dhaos-theory xhaos-theory fhaos-theory fhaos-theory vhaos-theory cyaos-theory cgaos-theory cbaos-theory cuaos-theory cnaos-theory cuaos-theory cjaos-theory cnaos-theory chqos-theory chwos-theory chzos-theory chwos-theory chsos-theory chzos-theory cha9s-theory chais-theory chaks-theory cha0s-theory chals-theory cha0s-theory chaps-theory chals-theory chaow-theory chaoa-theory chaoz-theory chaoe-theory chaox-theory chaoe-theory chaod-theory chaox-theory chaos0theory chaosptheory chaos[theory chaos-5heory chaos-rheory chaos-fheory chaos-6heory chaos-gheory chaos-6heory chaos-yheory chaos-gheory chaos-tyeory chaos-tgeory chaos-tbeory chaos-tueory chaos-tneory chaos-tueory chaos-tjeory chaos-tneory chaos-th3ory chaos-thwory chaos-thsory chaos-th4ory chaos-thdory chaos-th4ory chaos-throry chaos-thdory chaos-the9ry chaos-theiry chaos-thekry chaos-the0ry chaos-thelry chaos-the0ry chaos-thepry chaos-thelry chaos-theo4y chaos-theoey chaos-theody chaos-theo5y chaos-theofy chaos-theo5y chaos-theoty chaos-theofy chaos-theor6 chaos-theort chaos-theorg chaos-theor7 chaos-theorh chaos-theor7 chaos-theoru chaos-theorh chaos-yheory chaos-tyheory chaos-theorysUntil to-night, neither she nor Alessandro had spoken of were real troubles at all. I wish I could do something for your them, could I not? I could teach them to read. The Sisters always one could do. I wish I could teach your people. Have you any that you -- love, Alessandro?" Alessandro was too much absorbed in thoughts of his people, to question. "Yes, Senorita, I love them all. They are like my brothers and them all the time." During the whole of this conversation Ramona had had an The more Alessandro said about his father and his people, the would be hard to break, the more she feared his father would not thought of his going away, her very heart sickened. Taking a afraid your father will not give his consent to your staying here." "So am I, Senorita," he replied sadly. "And you would not stay if he did not approve of it, of course," she the tears filled her eyes. Alessandro saw them. The world changed in that second. eyes! O Senorita, then you will not be angry if I say that I love having said the words. Hardly did he trust his palpitating senses to be telling him true.